Existential import status for universal premises in Aristotelian logic?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $25.99Unlock all

Prepare for the Traditional Logic Memoria Press Test. Optimize your learning with flashcards and in-depth explanations to boost your exam readiness.

Multiple Choice

Existential import status for universal premises in Aristotelian logic?

Explanation:
In Aristotelian (traditional) syllogistic, universal propositions carry existential import: they presuppose that the subject term denotes a real, nonempty class. So, from a universal assertion about a subject, we commit to there being at least one object that falls under that subject term. That’s why the correct idea is that universal premises imply existence of the subject. The existence of the predicate term isn’t guaranteed in all cases—for example, a universal negation can be true even if the predicate class is empty—so the main import is about the subject, not necessarily about the predicate.

In Aristotelian (traditional) syllogistic, universal propositions carry existential import: they presuppose that the subject term denotes a real, nonempty class. So, from a universal assertion about a subject, we commit to there being at least one object that falls under that subject term. That’s why the correct idea is that universal premises imply existence of the subject. The existence of the predicate term isn’t guaranteed in all cases—for example, a universal negation can be true even if the predicate class is empty—so the main import is about the subject, not necessarily about the predicate.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy